[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: WG Last Call: draft-ietf-v6ops-unman-scenarios-00.txt

To: "Bonness, Olaf" <Olaf.Bonness@t-systems.com>
Subject: Re: WG Last Call: draft-ietf-v6ops-unman-scenarios-00.txt
From: Ronald van der Pol <Ronald.vanderPol@rvdp.org>
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 13:43:53 +0100
Cc: Ronald.vanderPol@rvdp.org, Jim.Bound@hp.com, huitema@windows.microsoft.com, pekkas@netcore.fi, mrw@windriver.com, v6ops@ops.ietf.org
In-reply-to: <C3F9C806AEC6D5119643000347055E3207E7AF36@G9JNW.mgb01.telekom.de>
References: <C3F9C806AEC6D5119643000347055E3207E7AF36@G9JNW.mgb01.telekom.de>
User-agent: Mutt/1.4i

On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 13:29:05 +0100, Bonness, Olaf wrote:

> Hi Ronald,
> 
> from my point of view it's fairly obvious to have different subnets within my soho environment for instance one for every room I have or besides that when I want to use parts of my home (network) for professional reasons and want to separate this from my normal / private life.

Yes, but I would like to know why it is fairly obvious. Is it because
you want to use different ACLs on the different subnets? (ACLs and
unmanaged networks don't fit well together :-) Is it because they use
different technologies with different MTUs. Something else?

	rvdp

References:
- AW: WG Last Call: draft-ietf-v6ops-unman-scenarios-00.txt
  - From: "Bonness, Olaf" <Olaf.Bonness@t-systems.com>

Prev by Date: AW: WG Last Call: draft-ietf-v6ops-unman-scenarios-00.txt
Next by Date: Re: Last Call Reviewers
Previous by thread: AW: WG Last Call: draft-ietf-v6ops-unman-scenarios-00.txt
Next by thread: Re: AW: WG Last Call: draft-ietf-v6ops-unman-scenarios-00.txt
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread