[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: WG Last Call: draft-ietf-v6ops-unman-scenarios-00.txt

To: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>
Subject: Re: WG Last Call: draft-ietf-v6ops-unman-scenarios-00.txt
From: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 15:41:07 +0100
Cc: "Anders Eriksson C (EAB)" <Anders.C.Eriksson@era.ericsson.se>, Ronald van der Pol <Ronald.vanderPol@rvdp.org>, v6ops@ops.ietf.org
In-reply-to: Your message of Mon, 10 Mar 2003 16:30:40 +0200. <Pine.LNX.4.44.0303101628001.26683-100000@netcore.fi>

 In your previous mail you wrote:

   Note: the definition is not "home" or "SoHo" network.
   
=> I agree: if the restriction to one subnet is a problem,
the solution is to create a new document for lightly managed
networks.

Regards

Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr

References:
- RE: WG Last Call: draft-ietf-v6ops-unman-scenarios-00.txt
  - From: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>

Prev by Date: RE: WG Last Call: draft-ietf-v6ops-unman-scenarios-00.txt
Next by Date: RE: WG Last Call: draft-ietf-v6ops-unman-scenarios-00.txt
Previous by thread: RE: WG Last Call: draft-ietf-v6ops-unman-scenarios-00.txt
Next by thread: RE: WG Last Call: draft-ietf-v6ops-unman-scenarios-00.txt
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread