RE: Note on Scenarios for IPv6

[Margaret Wasserman <mrw@windriver.com>]

Hi Jim,

> What I was referencing (not picking on Pekka) was Pekka's mail to our
> Ent draft and short discussion Pekka had with Bob Fink regarding
> defining the IPv4 Enterprise in scenarios not IPv6.
I'll go back and check, but I think that the only scope
issue we've been discussing with a v6ops scenario draft
is the ISP draft, not the Enterprise draft.

The ISP draft includes some execellent work that describes
current IPv4 installations, but it doesn't (yet) explain
how/when/where/if IPv6 will be introduced, so it doesn't
set up scenarios that can be used to analyze the applicability
of coexistence mechanisms.

I believe that the ISP team is aware of the need to expand
the scope of their draft, and that they are working on it.

So, unless I've missed something important (if I have, Pekka,
please tell me), there is no disagreement about the scope
of the Enterprise draft.

Margaret