[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: WG Last Call: draft-ietf-v6ops-3gpp-cases-02.txt
I've read the draft and the early comments, and I don't have any additional
comment.
I think it will be ready with the proposed corrections.
Best regards,
César Olvera
Consulintel
----- Original Message -----
From: "Margaret Wasserman" <mrw@windriver.com>
To: <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>
Sent: Monday, February 17, 2003 6:04 PM
Subject: WG Last Call: draft-ietf-v6ops-3gpp-cases-02.txt
>
>
> Hi All,
>
> This is a WG Last Call for comments on sending the 3GPP scenarios
> document to the IESG for consideration as an Informational RFC:
>
> Title: Transition Scenarios for 3GPP Networks
> Filename: draft-ietf-v6ops-3gpp-cases-02.txt
> Editor: J. Soininen
> Date: January 2003
>
> The document can be found at:
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-v6ops-3gpp-cases-02.txt
>
> Abstract
>
> This document describes different scenarios in Third Generation
> Partnership Project (3GPP) defined packet network, i.e. General
> Packet Radio Service (GPRS) that would need IP version 6 and IP
> version 4 transition. The focus of this document is on the scenarios
> where the User Equipment (UE) connects to nodes in other networks,
> e.g. in the Internet. GPRS network internal transition scenarios,
> i.e. between different GPRS elements in the network, are out of scope
> of this document.
>
> The purpose of the document is to list the scenarios for further
> discussion and study.
>
> Since this is the first WG last call that we have had in the v6ops
> WG, we would like to remind you of the process that we discussed for
> WG last calls when we started this WG.
>
> The WG Last Call is a final check that the WG has rough consensus
> to advance the document to the IESG. Advancing a document to the
> IESG indicates that the WG believes that this document is both
> technically sound and useful. It also indicates that we believe
> that the document meets all of the requirements for publication
> as an RFC.
>
> To pass WG last call, this document must be reviewed and actively
> supported by a significant number of people, including experts in
> all applicable areas, or it will not be sent to the IESG.
>
> Silence does NOT indicate consent during this phase.
>
> So, please review this document carefully, and send your feedback
> to the list, indicating whether or not you believe that this
> document is ready to go to the IESG. Unless sufficient support
> is demonstrated on the list, the document will not be send to
> the IESG.
>
> Thanks,
> Margaret, Itojun and Bob
> v6ops WG Chairs
>
*****************************
Madrid 2003 Global IPv6 Summit
12-14 May 2003 - Register at:
http://www.ipv6-es.com