Re: draft-ietf-v6ops-mech-v2-00.txt

["Fred L. Templin" <ftemplin@IPRG.nokia.com>]

Erik,

So that there is no misunderstanding, my opinion is that the static 
scheme is
a MUST and any dynamic scheme is a qualified MAY.

Fred
ftemplin@iprg.nokia.com

Erik Nordmark wrote:

> > Better than warnings are mechanisms that would allow the encapsulator
> > to efficiently probe/monitor the path MTU to the decapsulator. See:
> >    
> Yes, the document already has a dynamic tunnel MTU scheme.
> The issue is what we require when folks want to use a static MTU for
> the tunnel.
>
> Given that feedback in the past has been to allow the static scheme since
> it is more widely implemented than the dynamic scheme it would seem
> odd to mandate a dynamic scheme - whether the current one in the draft
> or the one in your recent draft.
>
>  Erik
>
>