Re: draft-ietf-v6ops-mech-v2-00.txt

["Fred L. Templin" <ftemplin@IPRG.nokia.com>]

Erik Nordmark wrote:

> > So that there is no misunderstanding, my opinion is that the static 
> > scheme is
> > a MUST and any dynamic scheme is a qualified MAY.
> >    
> That is what the draft currently says.
We're in agreement here, but this is not what is at issue. Still at 
issue are the
following points:

1) When the static MTU mechanism in 'mech-v2-00.txt' is used, the 1280+20
    limitation seems too restrictive. Suggest changing to 1380+20.

2) When the dynamic MTU scheme in 'mech-v2-00.txt' is used, black holes
     and/or denial of service can result. Suggest considering the 
dynamic MTU
    schemes in 'draft-templin-isatap-pre13.txt'.

Fred
ftemplin@iprg.nokia.com