RE: Dynamic DNS

["Tony Hain" <alh-ietf@tndh.net>]

I was commenting on his issue with lack of records in the Windows server
dns table. As I read it the linux implementation was working for him,
and he was having a problem with the MS one. I was not saying anything
else.

Tony

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bound, Jim [mailto:Jim.Bound@hp.com] 
> Sent: Friday, May 02, 2003 4:11 AM
> To: alh-ietf@tndh.net; BEGIN, Thomas; v6ops@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: RE: Dynamic DNS
> 
> 
> Tony,
> 
> Excuse me but why do you say MS?  There are many operating 
> systems that have deployed IPv6 that in fact do autoregisration.
> 
> Thomas,
> 
> Send me mail off line you can post this question to an IPv6 
> Forum implementors list where Linux, BSD, UNIXes, Microsoft, 
> and Proprietary OS developers exist to answer this question.  
> Also handheld developers.
> 
> Thanks
> /jim
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Tony Hain [mailto:alh-ietf@tndh.net]
> > Sent: Friday, April 25, 2003 1:36 PM
> > To: 'BEGIN, Thomas'; v6ops@ops.ietf.org
> > Subject: RE: Dynamic DNS
> > 
> > 
> > Thomas,
> > 
> > These questions are more appropriate for an MS mail list on
> > IPv6. I am not sure which one, but you might start with 
> > IPv6-fb@microsoft.com. 
> > 
> > That said, the early ship versions of many implementations
> > continue to rely on IPv4 for transport of services like DNS & 
> > SNMP. Trying to build an IPv6-only network in the short term 
> > will be a matter of persistence and working out which 
> > products and services will work without IPv4 in your network. 
> > Over time it will be possible to remove IPv4 from the 
> > network, but if we required that from the start we would 
> > never get anything deployed because there are too many 
> > players to synchronize.
> > 
> > Tony
> > 
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org 
> [mailto:owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org] On 
> > > Behalf Of BEGIN, 
> Thomas
> > > Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2003 5:45 AM
> > > To: v6ops@ops.ietf.org
> > > Subject: Dynamic DNS
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Hello,
> > > 
> > > I'm working on the relationship between IPv6 and DynamicDNS on 
> > > several OS. I've succeeded in making my testbed with an automatic 
> > > registration into the DNS at the startup of computers. 
> Then IPv4 and 
> > > v6 addresses are well recorded inside the DNS. But the 
> fact is that 
> > > I still have the IPv4 network. Next I tried to put off the IPv4 
> > > protocol from the network and get an only IPv6 network.
> > > * For the linux machines -> no problems
> > > * For the windows 2003 machines -> they are no more recorded 
> > > inside the DNS table
> > > 
> > > Thus I have few questions about this thema :
> > > - Is there anything special to setup in the OS to allow dynamic 
> > > updates over IPv6 ? may be in the netsh tool ? I've 
> searched myself 
> > > and haven't found ...
> > > - Is IPv4 necessary to carry the register messages that
> > > serves for the dynamic DNS updates ? It would mean that IPv6 
> > > is not autonomous on the new windows OS ? strange ...
> > > - Is there an equivalent of the command ipconfig /registerdns 
> > > ... that exists when IPv4 is shut down ? 
> > > 
> > > Regards
> > > - Thomas
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
>