RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-v6ops-unman-scenarios-01.txt

[Margaret Wasserman <mrw@windriver.com>]

Hi All,

Please review the changes to this document, and let us know if all
of your last call issues were adequately resolved.  If there are no
remaining issues, we hope to forward this document to the IESG by
the middle of next week.

Thanks,
Margaret


At 02:44 PM 6/5/2003 -0700, Christian Huitema wrote:
> The draft "draft-ietf-v6ops-uman-scenarios-01.txt" into account the
> comments received during the V6OPS WG last call for
> draft-ietf-v6ops-uman-scenarios-00.txt. The authors believe that this
> document addresses the last call comments. A list of these comments and
> the way they were addressed is available at:
>
>         http://www.huitema.net/ipv6/Unman-Scenarios-Issues.htm
>
> The main changes fall in three categories:
>
> 1) Change the topology section to explain exactly why we did not
> consider the multiple subnet case (i.e., with today's technology, such
> networks are not unmanaged);
>
> 2) Change several of the case description scenarios to remove the
> more-or-less implicit assumption that there is always a NAT in IPv4
> deployments;
>
> 3) Fix a number of editorial issues, notably the abstract, the
> introduction, the wording of references to DNS issues, and a split of
> references between normative and informative.
>
> -- Christian Huitema