[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: question on 'draft-huitema-v6ops-unmaneval-00.txt'

To: Christian Huitema <huitema@windows.microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: question on 'draft-huitema-v6ops-unmaneval-00.txt'
From: Fred Templin <ftemplin@IPRG.nokia.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 16:23:33 -0700
Cc: v6ops@ops.ietf.org
References: <DAC3FCB50E31C54987CD10797DA511BA03A6492D@WIN-MSG-10.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20021120 Netscape/7.01

This matches my understanding; thanks Christian,

Fred
ftemplin@iprg.nokia.com

Christian Huitema wrote:

I had one question relative to this document. Is there any reason why

an

analysis of isatap is not included in section 4.1?
No reason in particular. ISATAP would be midway between the two other
solutions, 6to4 and tunnel broker. Will fix that in next release.

References:
- RE: question on 'draft-huitema-v6ops-unmaneval-00.txt'
  - From: "Christian Huitema" <huitema@windows.microsoft.com>

Prev by Date: RE: question on 'draft-huitema-v6ops-unmaneval-00.txt'
Next by Date: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-lee-v6ops-natpt-mobility-00.txt
Previous by thread: RE: question on 'draft-huitema-v6ops-unmaneval-00.txt'
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread