comment on draft-palet-v6ops-proto41-nat-00.txt discussion

[Keith Moore <moore@cs.utk.edu>]

I agree with what Margaret said in the meeting - if we're going to
recommend behavior to NAT vendors we should recommend that the NATs
implement a v6 router.  Of course if they do that it's pretty simple and
obvious to have that router support a 6to4 interface.

I also agree that this document isn't the right place to put a detailed
recommendation about how to implement v6 in a SOHO v4NAT/v6router box.

So maybe it could be said that nailing up protocol 41 in a v4NAT box is
a temporary measure until the NATs can be upgraded to support v6
routing in the box?