RE: comment on draft-palet-v6ops-proto41-nat-00.txt discussion

["Christian Huitema" <huitema@windows.microsoft.com>]

I should have said that this was the dominant opinion. There was effectively no formal consensus call. Sorry for the confusion.

________________________________

From: itojun@itojun.org on behalf of itojun@iijlab.net
Sent: Tue 7/15/2003 8:28 AM
To: Keith Moore
Cc: Christian Huitema; v6ops@ops.ietf.org
Subject: Re: comment on draft-palet-v6ops-proto41-nat-00.txt discussion 



>> The consensus in the room was that Jordi's draft should simply
>> document the current practice, with all its considerations, and should
>> refrain from making any recommendation to NAT vendors.
>
>I must have missed that consensus call.

        i (and some others) commented like above, but there was no consensus
        call.  christian's statement is a little bit misleading i guess.

itojun