[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: comment: draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv4survey-intro-01.txt

To: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>
Subject: Re: comment: draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv4survey-intro-01.txt
From: itojun@iijlab.net
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 21:24:41 +0900
Cc: v6ops@ops.ietf.org, bob@thefinks.com, mrw@windriver.com,andreas.bergstrom@hiof.no
In-reply-to: pekkas's message of Tue, 22 Jul 2003 15:05:55 +0300. <Pine.LNX.4.44.0307221452410.3422-100000@netcore.fi>

>> line 397 (3.2.1)
>> 	i don't think there's enough specification for DHCPv6 options to
>> 	replace bootp as a whole.
>
>I don't know bootp in particular, but I'd bet DHCPv6 provides enough of 
>options to provide for bootp functionality.  Do you have some particular 
>options in mind?  DHCPv4 certainly has quite a bit more of them than 
>DHCPv6, though.

	most importantly, boot file name ("file" in RFC951 page 4).

itojun

Follow-Ups:
- Re: comment: draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv4survey-intro-01.txt
  - From: Ralph Droms <rdroms@cisco.com>

References:
- Re: comment: draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv4survey-intro-01.txt
  - From: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>

Prev by Date: Re: comment: draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv4survey-intro-01.txt
Next by Date: 3gpp-analysis-04: The use of 6to4
Previous by thread: Re: comment: draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv4survey-intro-01.txt
Next by thread: Re: comment: draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv4survey-intro-01.txt
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread