[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Thoughts on the extent of changes to IPv4 survey documents?
- To: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>, v6ops@ops.ietf.org
- Subject: Re: Thoughts on the extent of changes to IPv4 survey documents?
- From: Rute Sofia <rsofia@seas.upenn.edu>
- Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 16:17:37 +0100
- In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0307231055580.14514-100000@netcore.fi>
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0307231055580.14514-100000@netcore.fi>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312
Pekka,
regarding the ipv4 survey documents, from a global viewpoint and given
that the survey's purpose is simply to document identified IPv4
dependencies, the documents are just fine.
Rute
Pekka Savola wrote:
Hi editors (& co-chairs),
As you may have seen, we've started a WG last-call on a couple of the
first IPv4 survey documents. As feedback, itojun sent a couple of wording
change suggestions.
There are a lot of other possibilities to improve the documents as well,
but I'm not sure if it's worth the trouble.
I'd like to solicit your thoughts as editors on what you feel is the
appropriate extent/scope of changes in the IPv4 survey documents?
Please respond (if you have any opinions) here or in the v6ops thread.
Thanks