Re: Automatic tunnels

[Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis@kurtis.pp.se>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

>> The alternative is dual-stack, but if I would be a carrier I would be
>> very reluctant to roll-out dual-stack software (or at least to 
>> activate
>> it) on my routers.
>
> I'm curious, what do you see as the main reasons for this?
>

Experience? :-) The two vendors have enough of a problem to get v4 
packets from interface A to interface B, and that is with customers 
that are paying for SLAs...

I know it's being done and on pretty large networks as well. But I also 
hear people that are having problems in doing so.

- - kurtis -

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0.2

iQA/AwUBPyZBIKarNKXTPFCVEQI1HwCgm+pypVvFW5x9nbAP4NratusukHEAn0dC
ttZk9pXKc87JMSM0IDIO9WU1
=wxGW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----