Re: Automatic tunnels

[Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis@kurtis.pp.se>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

>> There are many networks that have gone dual stack, so what you're 
>> saying
>> is we need more operational experience feedback of the problems, 
>> rather
>> than just the success stories.   The early adoptors are the US and 
>> European
>> research networks and backbones.   I think they've been instrumental 
>> in
>> helping Cisco, Juniper et al iron out many of the problems to make 
>> deployment less problematic (but by no means straightforward) for 
>> ISPs.
>>
>>
> Completely agree. NRENs are in the group of ISPs with more IPv6 
> experience. And, it is a fact that this helped vendors to tackle 
> problems. Also, given that NRENs are quite different in topology and 
> equipment, their experience will for sure be benefitial as an example 
> on how to deploy IPv6 for other ISPs...

There is also the fact that NRENs does not have to generate ROI for 
their deployment, while many ISPs are struggling to do ROI on IPv4. 
Which again is a driver for a step-by-step approach.

Best regards,

- - kurtis -

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0.2

iQA/AwUBPyZVoKarNKXTPFCVEQINrQCg7hFykx+OCVbweS132TfdUBkWJmMAoLwC
goAvhR1IFUnbCSEVmTwxPWXa
=25Hu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----