[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Automatic tunnels

To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Subject: Re: Automatic tunnels
From: Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis@kurtis.pp.se>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 09:54:55 +0200
Cc: "JORDI PALET MARTINEZ" <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>, <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <E19hVlW-000GbM-69@ran.psg.com>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

>> The alternative is dual-stack, but if I would be a carrier I would be
>> very reluctant to roll-out dual-stack software (or at least to 
>> activate
>> it) on my routers.
>
> i guess that depends on whether you are locked into a router vendor
> who lacks support of ipv6 in their hardware.

To some extent , yes. Or what the cost of getting that hardware is.

- - kurtis -

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0.2

iQA/AwUBPyd50aarNKXTPFCVEQKtzwCfd2fs5R10H8gC1RAHLjiSpmWpeMUAn2WU
xucA2Ihb0znJr/Xhltj3z/DF
=0Umg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

References:
- Re: Automatic tunnels
  - From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Automatic tunnels
Next by Date: RE: [mobile-ip] Re: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-tsirtsis-dsmip-problem-00.txt
Previous by thread: Re: Automatic tunnels
Next by thread: Re: Automatic tunnels
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread