[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Defintion of Automatic tunnels
On 3 Aug 2003 at 12:45, Bound, Jim wrote:
> 100% agree with Christian I strongly suggest to the chairs and ADs work
> on the specs and stop trying to tell vendors how to build or what to
> provide in products we won't listen to your here simply because the
> folks here do not do budgets and product decisions per se it is done
> based on revenue not computer science.
>
> Like Pekka awhile ago saying "just state no one can deploy IPv6 only
> devices" that is completely absurd no one is going to even listen to
> such diatribe in the market.
>
> also I have figured out a way to avoid nat in IM for 3GPP the question
> for me is it even worth sharing that pearl here in the IETF or just take
> it to 3GPP and TEMS vendors. Hint is option I found in pdp context
> packet.
>
> /jim
Hello,
Whatever you decide, please let know the solution? I'd be interested
in getting to know it, probably others as well.
Enjoy the Sunday, or what's left of it,
Marcin
----------------------------------------------------------
Marcin Michalak Research Engineer
Mobile: +41 79 330 83 51 Telscom AG