Re: WG Last Call: a batch of draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv4survey-*01 documents

[Brian E Carpenter <brc@zurich.ibm.com>]

Hi,

This is important work and IMHO it's almost ready to ship.

1. draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv4survey-intro-01.txt

Section 1.1 is too editorial, and section 1.2 is irrelevant.
I would simply delete them. If a historical reference is wanted,
use RFC 1752.

The second and third paragraphs of Section 1.3 are also irrelevant,
and should be removed, and tossed over the fence to the Problem WG.
[I happen to agree with these paragraphs, but they don't belong here.]

The rest of this draft is excellent.

2. draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv4survey-subip-01.txt     

No comments

3. draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv4survey-ops-01.txt       

No substantive comments.

s/depreciated/deprecated/ (at least twice)
   
     Brian

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Brian E Carpenter 
Distinguished Engineer, Internet Standards & Technology, IBM 

NEW ADDRESS <brc@zurich.ibm.com> PLEASE UPDATE ADDRESS BOOK

Pekka Savola wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> This is a WG Last Call for comments on sending the following first three
> "Survey of IPv4 Addresses in Currently Deployed IETF Standards" documents
> to the IESG for consideration as Informational RFCs:
> 
> Introduction to the Survey of IPv4 Addresses in Currently
> Deployed IETF Standards
>   http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv4survey-intro-01.txt
> 
> Survey of IPv4 Addresses in Currently Deployed IETF Sub-IP Area Standards
>   http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv4survey-subip-01.txt
> 
> Survey of IPv4 Addresses in Currently Deployed IETF Operations &
> Management Area Standards
>   http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv4survey-ops-01.txt
> 
> Please review these documents carefully, and send your feedback to the
> list (editorial modifications may also be sent to the editor, Andreas).
> Please also indicate whether or not you believe that this document is
> ready to go to the IESG.  Silence does NOT indicate consent.  Unless
> sufficient support is demonstrated on the list, the documents will not be
> send to the IESG.
> 
> Please note that the first document ("introduction") includes the summary
> of all the results, which are subject to change; please ignore the details
> of section 3 when reviewing it.
> 
> The last call will end in 3 weeks, on 12th August.
> 
> Pekka, Margaret & Bob