Re: [mobile-ip] FW: I-D ACTION:draft-tsirtsis-dsmip-problem-00.tx t

[Pekka Nikander <pekka.nikander@nomadiclab.com>]

[ post by non-subscriber.  with the massive amount of spam, it is easy to miss
 and therefore delete posts by non-subscribers.  if you wish to regularly
 post from an address that is not subscribed to this mailing list, send a
 message to <listname>-owner@ops.ietf.org and ask to have the alternate
 address added to the list of addresses from which submissions are
 automatically accepted. ]

Soliman Hesham wrote:
> => We're definitely concerned with existing deployment
> and its evolution (read: incremental approaches). I don't
> think this is a very narrow scope at all but we can certainly
> add that to the draft. 
> IMHO, right now at
>  > least I remain confused which one your draft refers to.
>  > (Maybe I just read the draft too quickly.)
>
> => Hopefully this makes things clearer. We can add text
> to that effect. 
Please do add text, already at the abstract at least.
Just to avoid any further confusion.

--Pekka Nikander