RE: "IPv6 transition security" problem statement from a workshop that never happened

[Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>]

> these are valid deployment statements and they are being seen by
> industry too.  I would also argue very normal deployment issues
> for any technology. Not show stoppers though.

ah, then we are not far from agreement, though a bit violently, at
least for my taste (but i was brought up by an uncle who was a
pacifist in ww2).

like too much of our work, the world is far more complex than it
used to be.  what are "normal deployment" issues today can be a
bit more daunting than those of a few years back, e.g., we used
not to consider security at all.  so what we are trying to do
today is being examined using criteria which are more stringent
than in previous technology deployments.

so i am not as sanguine about how easy it is and will be than you
seem to be.  but the proof will be in the pudding, eh?  so best to
go about making the pudding.

randy