Re: 3gpp-analysis: the way forward to revision -05

[Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>]

Hi,

Writing as co-chair..

Thanks to Juha for taking this list together.  For reference, I think we
can separate the issues that weren't downright closed (e.g. seem to have
been resolved or waiting for some other action) in two.

Topics which don't seem to be closed which probably require more
attention, in some form or another (possibly cannot be settled by textual
updates without further WG feedback etc.):

> 2) Use of NAT-PT in IPv6 UE -> IPv4 node
> 
> 6) Transition mechanisms at UEs
> 
> 9) Automatic tunneling inside 3GPP operator's network

and those issues which were not discussed at all (or in limited scale);  
that could of might or might not mean that there are no objections to the
comments.

> 4) The use of 6to4
>
> 7) Tunnels out of 3GPP operator's network
> 
> 8) Need for UE <-> 3GPP Configuration  <-- probably rather important?!
> 
> 10) SIP/SDP transition

Anything I've missed?  Disagreements on the classification?

If you have comments on these issues (please do! :-), please send them to
the specific threads.

-- 
Pekka Savola                 "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy                    kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings