Re: reverse delegation of 2002:xxxx:xxxx:: ?

[Brian E Carpenter <brc@zurich.ibm.com>]

I've heard it suggested that reverse lookup should maybe not
even be set up at all for 6to4, or that it should simply be synthesized
automatically. 

I've certainly heard it suggested that this is a topic for dnsops, 
not for either IPv6 WG.

   Brian

bmanning@karoshi.com wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, 25 Aug 2003, Antonio Querubin wrote:
> > > Does anybody know what the current procedure (if any) is for getting
> > > reverse delegation of 6to4 address space going?  I see 2.0.0.2.ip6.int but
> > > no 2.0.0.2.in-addr.arpa zone.
> >
> > Btw, this should be in v6ops WG list, I think. (Please remove ipng from
> > possible follow-ups.)
> >
> > As for the current procedure, currently there is none.
> >
> > draft-ymbk-6to4-arpa-delegation-00.txt should be in IETF Last Call,
> > though.  That would enable the owner of the IPv4 address space to get 6to4
> > reverse delegations from the RIRs, I think.
> 
>         Presuming the RIRs even want to do this.
>         Until/Unless such time as the draft passes and
>         the RIRs adopt such a stratagy, registration in
>         2.0.0.2.ip6.int is still available.
> 
> --bill

-- 
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Brian E Carpenter 
Distinguished Engineer, Internet Standards & Technology, IBM 

NEW ADDRESS <brc@zurich.ibm.com> PLEASE UPDATE ADDRESS BOOK