[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Work in the GGF IPv6 WG (fwd)
FYI,
Brian et al. mentioned collaboration with a pending Global Grid Forum IPv6
WG in the Vienna IETF; we should be able to increase the relevance of our
work by working together :-)
--
Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2003 16:20:48 +0200
From: Brian E Carpenter <brc@zurich.ibm.com>
To: Robert Fink <bob@thefinks.com>, Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>,
Jonne.Soininen@nokia.com
Cc: Piers O'Hanlon <P.OHanlon@cs.ucl.ac.uk>, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>,
Peter Clarke <clarke@hep.ucl.ac.uk>
Subject: Work in the GGF IPv6 WG
Dear v6ops chairs,
Piers O'Hanlon and I are co-chairs of the about-to-be-created IPv6-WG
in the Global Grid Forum. I've attached our draft charter, and if you
should want to join the mailing list, you do so by saying "subscribe ipv6-wg"
to <majordomo@ggf.org>. We don't yet have a WG web site, but when
we do, it will be somewhere at http://forge.gridforum.org/ .
Our GGF Area Director is Peter Clarke. (Peter, the IETF work can be
found at http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/v6ops-charter.html .)
As you will see, our first two deliverables are not so different from
some of the work in v6ops. In fact, Rute Sofia, who is co-author
of draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv4survey-apps-01.txt, will also be working on
the GGF equivalent of that draft. We will also look carefully at
draft-shin-v6ops-application-transition-01.txt.
This is FYI at the moment, but as we progress with our deliverables,
closer cooperation might be a Good Thing. Feel free to forward this note.
Regards
Brian
--
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Brian E Carpenter
Distinguished Engineer, Internet Standards & Technology, IBM
NEW ADDRESS <brc@zurich.ibm.com> PLEASE UPDATE ADDRESS BOOK
1
DRAFT 2003-08-07
IPv6 Working Group
Global Grid Forum, Data Area
Administrative Information
Name and Acronym:
IPv6-WG
Chairs:
Brian Carpenter <brc@zurich.ibm.com>
Piers O'Hanlon <P.OHanlon@cs.ucl.ac.uk>
Secretary(s)/Webmaster(s):
tbd
Email list:
ipv6-wg@ggf.org
Web page:
http://forge.ggf.org/projects/ipv6-wg
Charter
Focus/Purpose
IPv6 is now emerging as a significant factor in
operational networks, and continued scaling up of the
Internet (and thus of Grids) will require the additional
address space and management features of IPv6. It is
therefore important that all GGF specifications work as
well (or better) with IPv6 as with IPv4. The purpose of
the working group is to identify any GGF specifications
that do not meet this requirement, to provide appropriate
guidelines for future specifications, and to communicate
any issues discovered with IPv6 to the IETF.
Scope
The scope is IP version dependencies in the output of all
working groups in all GGF areas. However, it is expected
that many WGs will be quickly eliminated as having no
such dependencies. Any specification that involves the
handling of network I/O or IP addresses, or the
processing or display of URLs is likely to be affected.
Goals
Either two or three deliverables are planned, according
to the result of the work.
1. IP version dependencies in GGF specifications. This
will be an Informational document identifying each GGF
specification (approved or public draft) that contains
dependencies on IPv4 (principally address format and
length). It is intended to be used as a checklist for
planning the necessary document revisions by the WGs
concerned.
Milestone for draft: GGF9
Milestone for final: before GGF10
2. Guidelines for IP version independence in GGF
specifications. This will be an informational document
describing how to avoid IPv4 dependency in GGF
specifications. It is intended to be used by all GGF WGs
and as a checklist for document approval.
Milestone for draft: GGF9
Milestone for final: before GGF10
3. Issues in IPv6 specifications. If the work on these
two deliverables identifies any issues in the IETF
specifications for IPv6, the third deliverable will be an
Informational liaison document to be sent to the IETF
describing these issues. If no such issues are found, or
if they are accepted by the IETF through informal
liaison, the document will not be produced.
Milestone for draft: GGF10
Milestone for final: TBD
Management Issues
Evidence of commitments to carry out WG tasks
Brian Carpenter and Piers O'Hanlon are committed to lead.
We have at least 6 other people who have indicated
willingness to contribute actively.
Pre-existing Document(s) (if any)
Two highly relevant IETF drafts:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv4survey-apps-01.txt
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-shin-v6ops-application-transition-01.txt
We will in fact investigate whether direct collaboration
with the IETF is possible.
Exit Strategy
It is not expected that the WG will have any reason to
continue after the deliverables have been published
Any other relevant information
n/a