>From draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv4survey-ops-02.txt: 7.3.20 RADIUS MIB (RFC 2618) The problems have not been addressed and a new MIB should be defined. 7.3.21 RADIUS Authentication Server MIB (RFC 2619) The problems have not been addressed and a new MIB should be defined. There is more detail in the survey document itself. So if a RADIUSEXT WG is formed, do we want to at least evaluate these? Thanks, Bert