[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: draft-cmetz-v6ops-v4mapped-api-harmful-00.txt and draft-itojun-v6ops-v4mapped-harmful-01.txt

To: mtortonesi@ing.unife.it
Subject: Re: draft-cmetz-v6ops-v4mapped-api-harmful-00.txt and draft-itojun-v6ops-v4mapped-harmful-01.txt
From: itojun@itojun.org (Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino)
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 05:17:45 +0900 (JST)
Cc: v6ops@ops.ietf.org
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 11 Sep 2003 14:35:00 +0200 (CEST)" <Pine.LNX.4.53.0309111429260.12641@giskard.ing.unife.it>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.53.0309111429260.12641@giskard.ing.unife.it>

> what happened to draft-cmetz-v6ops-v4mapped-api-harmful-00.txt and
> draft-itojun-v6ops-v4mapped-harmful-01.txt?

	we'll update those document eventually.  we're too busy with random
	things, but our opinion has not changed yet (so we need to submit a
	new veresion).

itojun

References:
- draft-cmetz-v6ops-v4mapped-api-harmful-00.txt and draft-itojun-v6ops-v4mapped-harmful-01.txt
  - From: Mauro Tortonesi <mtortonesi@ing.unife.it>

Prev by Date: Re: draft-cmetz-v6ops-v4mapped-api-harmful-00.txt and draft-itojun-v6ops-v4mapped-harmful-01.txt
Next by Date: Numbers of NAT-s in IPv4/IPv6 Network? One or more?
Previous by thread: Re: draft-cmetz-v6ops-v4mapped-api-harmful-00.txt and draft-itojun-v6ops-v4mapped-harmful-01.txt
Next by thread: RE: draft-cmetz-v6ops-v4mapped-api-harmful-00.txt and draft-itojun-v6ops-v4mapped-harmful-01.txt
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread