Re: 3gpp-analysis-05: Automatic tunneling inside 3GPP operator's network

[Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>]

On Wed, 1 Oct 2003, Jasminko Mulahusic wrote:
> > Right.  Although I would rephrase this:
> > 
> > I am proposing that the systems either:
> > 
> >  1) run multiple routing protocol, one for IPv4 and one for IPv6
> > (basically, different combinations of OSPFv2|IS-IS and OSPFv3|IS-IS,
> > excluding RIPv2 and RIPng), or
> > 
> >  2) run a single routing protocol which includes both IPv4 and IPv6 over
> > the infrastructure supporting both (basically, IS-IS)
> > 
> 
> i fail to see why/how this should be discussed/handled within this 
> document. this is something for the isp team to think about and come 
> with solutions. after all, what has been discussed here are small ip 
> backbones and hopefully solutions for those will come out of the isp 
> design team.

Right.. there's already some text relating to this overlap in the
document.
 
> thus, i suggest completely removing section 3.2.1 or simply referencing 
> to the efforts being done within the isp design team.

That would be OK by me .. or if we can come up with a very minimalistic
proposal, that's fine too.

-- 
Pekka Savola                 "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy                    kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings