Re: Comments on draft-ietf-v6ops-ent-scenarios-00

["Chirayu Patel" <chirayu@chirayu.org>]

Some quick comments:

1. The definition of scenario needs to be clarified. I was under the
   assumption that a scenario would correspond to a stage in the
   deployment of IPv6 in the enterprise network. For example,
   the cases described in section 5 in
   http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-v6ops-unman-
   scenarios-03.txt.

2. The scenario description in section 3.1, and the examples in section
   3.3 do not seem to be in tune. The purpose of section 3.3 is to
   provide clarity on the base scenarios but, IMHO, it does not do that.
   For example, how does the example network A shed more light on
   Scenario 1, or 2, or 3?

CP


On Mon, 20 Oct 2003 09:48:57 +0300 (EEST), "Pekka Savola"
<pekkas@netcore.fi> said:
> On Sat, 18 Oct 2003, Tim Chown wrote:
> > Here are some (long) comments on draft 00.  I am sorry they are later
> > than ideal but I hope they are still useful prior to Minneapolis.
> >
> > The document is absolutely on the right track, in my view.  The
> > detail of comments is mainly for clarification :)
> [...]
>
> Thanks Tim.  These kind of comments are exactly what we need to move
> the scenarios documents forward.  Hopefully other folks also have a
> chance to read and comment on the document.
>
> Pekka writing as WG co-chair
>
>