[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Comments on draft-ietf-v6ops-ent-scenarios-00

Tim Chown wrote:

On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 02:57:44PM +0200, Eva M. Castro wrote:

I understand point 3.1 and 3.3 are very different, point 3.1 explains
transition scenarios, or IPv6 scenarios, and point 3.3 explains
existing enterprise scenarios. Maybe, it is more clear if the name
of these subsections is changed:

3.1 IPv6 transition base scenarios.
3.2 Scenarios Characteristics.
3.3 Enterprise specific scenario examples.


I guess my comments were too long for you - I suggested the same :)


ups! sorry :)

There was some confusion between motivations, scenarios, base scenarios
which I suggested some changes for.  Jim will be back in a week or so
and I'm sure will start collating comments.   So some reinforcement in
suggestions is good.



--> Agree with you and Chirayu.

Maybe, think of steps to get IPv6 in the enterprise scenario and try to connect aims of enterprise, network characteristics and final
scenario:
1) Think of applications will be run in the enterprise network.
2) Select the enterprise scenario based on the applications.
3) Get existing enterprise network characteristics.
4) Ways to obtain the enterprise scenario.


Chirayu Patel wrote:
>2. The scenario description in section 3.1, and the examples in section

  3.3 do not seem to be in tune. The purpose of section 3.3 is to
  provide clarity on the base scenarios but, IMHO, it does not do that.
  For example, how does the example network A shed more light on
  Scenario 1, or 2, or 3?




Regards,

eva