[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Proposal : Common issues across Scenarios Design Team should be new work item

To: "Bound, Jim" <jim.bound@hp.com>
Subject: Re: Proposal : Common issues across Scenarios Design Team should be new work item
From: Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis@kurtis.pp.se>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 08:31:18 +0100
Cc: <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <9C422444DE99BC46B3AD3C6EAFC9711B047CA182@tayexc13.americas.cpqcorp.net>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


	Jim,

> Proposal: Begin a new design team and effort to work on the common IPv6
> operational issues across any scenario that must be addressed (e.g. 
> DNS,
> Porting, Mail).  There are also probably common security issues for all
> scenarios in addition to the specific ones for each scenario work 
> effort
> in v6ops.

isn't what you are really saying that there might be issues identified 
by the DTs that really should go to other WGs?

- - kurtis -

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0.2

iQA/AwUBP59syKarNKXTPFCVEQJIUgCeOm6AHZoOZO5VzyPibQ/jxisV0VcAoJaq
hVRvHgO8avlxmAteocW/3nqp
=nWfQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

References:
- Proposal : Common issues across Scenarios Design Team should be new work item
  - From: "Bound, Jim" <jim.bound@hp.com>

Prev by Date: Re: v6ops-v6onbydefault: link-locals and AI_ADDRCONFIG
Next by Date: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-lind-v6ops-isp-scenarios-01.txt
Previous by thread: Re: Proposal : Common issues across Scenarios Design Team should be new work item
Next by thread: RE: Proposal : Common issues across Scenarios Design Team should be new work item
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread