[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Unicast Reverse Path Forwarding

To: Hobbes tiger extraordinaire <orly@redbrick.dcu.ie>
Subject: Re: Unicast Reverse Path Forwarding
From: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 20:18:57 +0200 (EET)
Cc: v6ops@ops.ietf.org
In-reply-to: <20031029120358.GA23376@carbon.redbrick.dcu.ie>

On Wed, 29 Oct 2003, Hobbes tiger extraordinaire wrote:
>   I was wondering if anyone can tell me if Unicast Reverse Path Forwarding is
> able to deal with IPv6 addresses on Cisco? JunOS appears to be able to manage
> both addresses.

This is off-topic for this list.  I suggest using the NSP list or 
contacting the vendor directly.

(Currently, it's not supported, FWIW.)

-- 
Pekka Savola                 "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy                    kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings

References:
- Unicast Reverse Path Forwarding
  - From: Hobbes tiger extraordinaire <orly@redbrick.dcu.ie>

Prev by Date: Re: v6ops-v6onbydefault: link-locals and AI_ADDRCONFIG
Next by Date: RE: Proposal : Common issues across Scenarios Design Team should be new work item
Previous by thread: Unicast Reverse Path Forwarding
Next by thread: RE: Unicast Reverse Path Forwarding
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread