RE: WG Last Call: draft-ietf-v6ops-mech-v2-01.txt

[Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>]

On Thu, 6 Nov 2003, Bound, Jim wrote:
> I do not support this going to PS only DS.  I will appeal most likely.

First, it would be nice if you explained why only DS is acceptable.

Note that there have been a large number of updates since the original
transmech.  I'd find it difficult to justify that we could go to DS
straight away. I'd personally really like to go to DS straight away, but
it doesn't seem like a possibility with the revisions the document has
undergone.  But if e.g. our AD/IESG says DS is fine, then it's fine with
me as well.

But if you do appeal, please try to be as clear about the grounds for
appeal as possible, and what action you seek (as stated in section 6.5 of
RFC 2026).

-- 
Pekka Savola                 "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy                    kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings