[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: WG Last Call: draft-ietf-v6ops-mech-v2-01.txt

To: jim.bound@hp.com
Subject: RE: WG Last Call: draft-ietf-v6ops-mech-v2-01.txt
From: itojun@itojun.org (Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino)
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 05:06:03 +0900 (JST)
Cc: pekkas@netcore.fi, v6ops@ops.ietf.org, bob@thefinks.com, jonne.soininen@nokia.com
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 6 Nov 2003 11:13:21 -0500" <9C422444DE99BC46B3AD3C6EAFC9711B05122558@tayexc13.americas.cpqcorp.net>
References: <9C422444DE99BC46B3AD3C6EAFC9711B05122558@tayexc13.americas.cpqcorp.net>

>> (We're hoping to recycle to Draft Standard soon afterwards.)
> I do not support this going to PS only DS.  I will appeal most likely.

	we are not going to DS this time, am i right?

itojun

Follow-Ups:
- Re: WG Last Call: draft-ietf-v6ops-mech-v2-01.txt
  - From: Fred Templin <ftemplin@iprg.nokia.com>

References:
- RE: WG Last Call: draft-ietf-v6ops-mech-v2-01.txt
  - From: "Bound, Jim" <jim.bound@hp.com>

Prev by Date: RE: WG Last Call: draft-ietf-v6ops-mech-v2-01.txt
Next by Date: Re: WG Last Call: draft-ietf-v6ops-mech-v2-01.txt
Previous by thread: Re: WG Last Call: draft-ietf-v6ops-mech-v2-01.txt
Next by thread: Re: WG Last Call: draft-ietf-v6ops-mech-v2-01.txt
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread