RE: NOTE: WG Last Call: draft-ietf-v6ops-mech-v2-01.txt

["Christian Huitema" <huitema@windows.microsoft.com>]

> > > 	i guess what you are trying to mean is "don't even need to USE
the
> > > 	link-local address of the peer, or the node itself".
> > Yep, of course.  The address is needed, but there's no use sweating
too
> > much what it is if it shouldn't need to be used anyway (by users at
> > least).. :-)
> 
> 	for implementers it matters a lot :-)

I am not so sure that implementation details belong in a standard track
RFC. The IETF is about interoperability, i.e. wire formats, protocol
state machines, and timers. If those are well specified, then two teams
can take the spec, develop their implementation, and interoperate.

-- Christian Huitema