Re: draft-palet-v6ops-proto41-nat-03 as WG item

[Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>]

On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 08:53:37PM +0200, Pekka Savola wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Nov 2003, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
>
> I do not think it clearly falls within the charter of the WG.  The only
> clear possibility I see is charter item (6), but that would not be
> acceptable until the analysis/scenarios work is complete and a clear need
> has been identified.

I think it fits charter item 1.  It does not involve new work.

> We're loaded enough already.  The analysis work must be finished before 
> jumping to the mechanisms.

I would hope the unman eval work will be finished before Christmas,
and the Proto-41 issue will/could address one recommended development
path there (at least based on what Christian presented yesterday).
So it is not long to wait.

The flip side of the coin is that we are already in the position of 
deployment leading standardisation by some way in v6ops.
 
Tim