RE: automatic tunneling and v6 interoperation

[Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>]

On Thu, 13 Nov 2003, Pascal Thubert (pthubert) wrote:
> On the side of this discussion (: sorry for the bother :) Here's (yet
> another) alternate possibility to enable IPv6 to traverse IPv4 PAT/NAT.
> It applies to IPv6 Mobile Nodes and Mobile Routers only, but if you have
> MIPv6 available, the rest of the way is pretty simple. I proposed it to
> Nemo and the suggestion I received was actually to post it to v6Ops. So
> here it is... Can you please consider:
> 
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-thubert-nemo-ipv4-traversal-01
> .txt

This has IPR application and Cisco is providing RAND terms.  My own
personal interest stopped just here -><-. (The same applies to Nemo basic
protocol as well, btw.)

Btw, Teredo has IPR application as well, the good thing is Microsoft is
offering RF terms for Standards Track implementations.  That may be a
problem has well, but not as severe one as RAND.

-- 
Pekka Savola                 "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy                    kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings