spending time on analysis [Re: draft-palet-v6ops-proto41-nat-03 as WG item]

[Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>]

On Fri, 14 Nov 2003 mariana.nikolova@philips.com wrote:
> During the plenary there was a clear indication from the WG members that 
> the group spends too much time on analysis/scenarios/aspects and this 
> process has to be speeded up. I do hope this will happen.

On the contrary, the WG spends too *little* time on analysis work, which 
is the reason for all the perceived problems of timeliness.

Our problem is that only few seem to care about it at all, just complain
that we aren't doing transition mechanisms and other stuff to suit the
market windows.  That's not going to happen until we're done.

If everyone pitched in in the final rush for the analysis/scenarios work, 
we might actually be done soon!  I certainly see a hope of progress in the 
short term, but then again, we need more input to the work!

This was probably said already two years ago, but folks didn't take it 
seriously, so you see the effect..

Please, *DO* participate in the analysis/scenarios effort!

-- 
Pekka Savola                 "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy                    kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings