[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Comments on unman-scenarios-03
On Mon, 17 Nov 2003, Christian Huitema wrote:
> Sorry, but your comments are coming too late. The draft already went
> through last call (back in June). The purpose of version 03 was to take
> into account some IESG comments. The high level issues you mentioned,
> stacked gateways or static addresses, were discussed through the draft
> progression and were considered somewhat marginal. Their absence in the
> draft is intentional.
Some of the few editorial nits can probably be fixed at AUTH48, but unless
you, Chirayu, think that there have been really significant omissions that
we should pull the draft back from the IESG's approval, please state
those.
On a more happy note, please ensure that the similar issues have been
proposerly addressed in the analysis document.
--
Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings