RE: 3gpp-analysis-07: (semi-)editorial issues

[Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>]

On Tue, 18 Nov 2003, Karim El-Malki (HF/EAB) wrote:
>  > Could you care to try to suggest a different reword to clarify the 
>  > different considerations with PDP context activation?
> 
> I would just tag a sentence to the end of the parag you suggested:
> 
>     If the 3GPP network supports both IPv4 and IPv6 PDP contexts, the UE may
>     activate the appropriate PDP context depending on the type of
>     application it has started; it may also make sense to open both PDP
>     contexts in advance, before they are used, because the activation of
>     a context may take a relatively long time. If both PDP Contexts are
>     not opened in advance then it may be necessary for an application
>     to trigger the creation of a new PDP Context when it determines
>     that a communication to an IPv6 peer is required and an IPv6 PDP
>     Context is not available.

Ok.  The last part  is a bit long.  I tried to summarize it a bit and make 
it more generic.  How about:

    If the 3GPP network supports both IPv4 and IPv6 PDP contexts, the UE may
    activate the appropriate PDP context depending on the type of
    application it has started; it may also make sense to open both PDP
    contexts in advance, before they are used, because the activation of
    a context may take a relatively long time.  However, if 
    the appropriate PDP context has not been activated before trying to 
    communicate with a peer, the application may trigger the activation of 
    the required PDP context type.

OK or suggest replacement?

-- 
Pekka Savola                 "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy                    kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings