[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 3gpp-analysis: Recommendation on tunneling in the UE

To: v6ops@ops.ietf.org
Subject: Re: 3gpp-analysis: Recommendation on tunneling in the UE
From: Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 13:58:52 +0000
In-reply-to: <37FB7AA6F5F9814FB634A7BF4C35A6F5639921@ESEALNT442.al.sw.ericsson.se>
Mail-followup-to: v6ops@ops.ietf.org
References: <37FB7AA6F5F9814FB634A7BF4C35A6F5639921@ESEALNT442.al.sw.ericsson.se>
User-agent: Mutt/1.4i

On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 02:50:13PM +0100, Karim El-Malki (HF/EAB) wrote:
> 
> I don't think the above "extra" features are in the current ISATAP
> spec and agree that it should focus on the basic host-to-router
> mechanism. Would satisfying the above make it acceptable?
> I think draft-16 does that. I'll review it myself and hope the wg
> finds time for that too.

I would agree with that.
 
Tim

Follow-Ups:
- Re: 3gpp-analysis: Recommendation on tunneling in the UE
  - From: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>

References:
- RE: 3gpp-analysis: Recommendation on tunneling in the UE
  - From: "Karim El-Malki (HF/EAB)" <karim.el-malki@ericsson.com>

Prev by Date: RE: 3gpp-analysis: Recommendation on tunneling in the UE
Next by Date: RE: 3gpp-analysis: DNS over v4 if availablen
Previous by thread: RE: 3gpp-analysis: Recommendation on tunneling in the UE
Next by thread: Re: 3gpp-analysis: Recommendation on tunneling in the UE
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread