Re: draft-palet-v6ops-proto41-nat-03 as WG item

[Fred Templin <ftemplin@iprg.nokia.com>]

Jordi,

JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:

> Hi Fred,
>
> I'm not sure to catch what do you mean and how much is serious in "NOT" ...
>
> Do you mean only some "expensive" (corporate ?) NATs do this ? I tried with very low cost models, and it works.

Pardon any misconceptions my message may have imparted. The
term "organizational" is just like the term "enterprise" in that it
may suggest to some a large, elaborate, expensive, corporate, etc.
entity.

In networking terms, however, an "organization" or an "enterprise"
could constitute anything from the simplest 1-2 node site to the
most complex internetwork in the world. So I did indeed intend
to cover everything from the least expensive home gateway to
the most elaborate corporate router in my blanket statement.

Fred
ftemplin@iprg.nokia.com

> Of course, actually it worked for me with the bigger networks (I assume more expensive routers), like the Minnesota airport one when waiting for my flight ...
>
> Regards,
> Jordi
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Fred Templin" <ftemplin@iprg.nokia.com>
> To: "JORDI PALET MARTINEZ" <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
> Cc: <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 6:55 PM
> Subject: Re: draft-palet-v6ops-proto41-nat-03 as WG item
>
>
>  
>
> > Jordi,
> >
> > You can count me as favoring this work going forward, but I'd like to
> > suggest that a NAT that does the proper proto41 forwarding is unlike
> > a NAT in the traditional sense and perhaps in need of a new name. My
> > suggestion is:
> >
> >  Network Organizational Translator (NOT)
> >
> > Fred
> > ftemplin@iprg.nokia.com
> >
> > JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
> >
> >    
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > In the yesterday meeting, I've presented the latest version of http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-palet-v6ops-proto41-nat-03, the slides are available at http://www.euro6ix.org/standardization/v6ops-proto41-nat_ietf58.zip (previous slides from Vienna also at http://www.euro6ix.org/standardization/v6ops-proto41-nat_ietf57.zip).
> > >
> > > As nobody provided any new suggestions or objections to this document, during the meeting, my feeling is that it could be accepted as WG item.
> > >
> > > In addition to the comment from Mariana, I got a couple of suggestions off-line that we will like to address in the next few days, so will like to take the opportunity publish the review already as WG item version 00 and keep going with the work.
> > >
> > > Please, let me know if you feel this is acceptable or do you have any objections.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Jordi
> > >
> > > **********************************
> > > Madrid 2003 Global IPv6 Summit
> > > Presentations and videos on line at:
> > > http://www.ipv6-es.com
> > >
> > > This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >      
> >
> >    
>
> **********************************
> Madrid 2003 Global IPv6 Summit
> Presentations and videos on line at:
> http://www.ipv6-es.com
>
> This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.
>
>
>
>