[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: draft-palet-v6ops-proto41-nat-03 as WG item
Carlos,
I think is indicated by the applicability section that is expected to be used in SOHO. But you're right, I need to check it and we can complete more that text to explain this situation. Only happens if both users are using the same tunnel end point.
Actually I expect the hotel to provide native or 6to4, or even use proto-41 but with a local IPv6 router (a simple PC can do it) providing IPv6 to all the guest.
Actually if you are in the Minnesota airport at the same time, I provided RA to allow anyone to use my laptop as an IPv6 router ;-)
Regards,
Jordi
----- Original Message -----
From: "Carlos Friacas" <cfriacas@fccn.pt>
To: <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 7:14 PM
Subject: Re: draft-palet-v6ops-proto41-nat-03 as WG item
>
> Hello,
>
> Has the "uniqueness" problem been solved/sorted out?
>
> E.g.:
>
> If i and Jordi attend the same conference and stay on the same hotel,
> which only has a nat box, can we both use this "mechanism"?
> Or should i have to phone Jordi and say: "Hey, can you disconnect for 5
> mins, i need to use IPv6!".
>
> Is this still true? Is this *clearly* reflected on the current draft
> version?
>
> Regards,
> Carlos
>
>
> On Tue, 18 Nov 2003, Fred Templin wrote:
>
> > Jordi,
> >
> > You can count me as favoring this work going forward, but I'd like to
> > suggest that a NAT that does the proper proto41 forwarding is unlike
> > a NAT in the traditional sense and perhaps in need of a new name. My
> > suggestion is:
> >
> > Network Organizational Translator (NOT)
> >
> > Fred
> > ftemplin@iprg.nokia.com
> >
> > JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
> >
> > >Hi all,
> > >
> > >In the yesterday meeting, I've presented the latest version of http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-palet-v6ops-proto41-nat-03, the slides are available at http://www.euro6ix.org/standardization/v6ops-proto41-nat_ietf58.zip (previous slides from Vienna also at http://www.euro6ix.org/standardization/v6ops-proto41-nat_ietf57.zip).
> > >
> > >As nobody provided any new suggestions or objections to this document, during the meeting, my feeling is that it could be accepted as WG item.
> > >
> > >In addition to the comment from Mariana, I got a couple of suggestions off-line that we will like to address in the next few days, so will like to take the opportunity publish the review already as WG item version 00 and keep going with the work.
> > >
> > >Please, let me know if you feel this is acceptable or do you have any objections.
> > >
> > >Regards,
> > >Jordi
> > >
> > >**********************************
> > >Madrid 2003 Global IPv6 Summit
> > >Presentations and videos on line at:
> > >http://www.ipv6-es.com
> > >
> > >This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.
>
**********************************
Madrid 2003 Global IPv6 Summit
Presentations and videos on line at:
http://www.ipv6-es.com
This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.