[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ISATAP and admin/IP domains [RE: 3gpp-analysis: Recommendatio n on tunneling in the UE]
Not sure but then, for this "misuse", I think the scenarios work is not so useful ... because we will not be able to figure out all the possible combinations. We are just trying on the other way, isolating a few, when there are too many, with too many combinations, too much complicated, too many dependencies, too length process that will not be possible until all the 4 scenarios are done.
Instead we need to put all the possibilities together of were each transition tool can be used. It seems to me much simpler. If we take longer and longer, the market will deploy more and more bad transition tools, and will be worst, less controlled.
Just a good description of each transition tool "own scenarios" will be a better start. Simultaneously, in parallel, we need also to look into a set of priorities/conflicts document: What order to choose, when several transition tools are available. Any conflicts among several of them ?
Regards,
Jordi
----- Original Message -----
From: "Pekka Savola" <pekkas@netcore.fi>
To: "JORDI PALET MARTINEZ" <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
Cc: <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 8:12 PM
Subject: Re: ISATAP and admin/IP domains [RE: 3gpp-analysis: Recommendatio n on tunneling in the UE]
> On Tue, 18 Nov 2003, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
> > I know for sure that we like it or not, the transition mechanisms
> > will be used in the "wrong" scenarios, same as NAT-PT is used some
> > times for what it was not designed, and we have a very little chance
> > to change it. So may be the goal is to make several mechanism to
> > work together in a single "tool box".
>
> .. which is all the more reason for doing the analysis before getting
> down to the mechanisms. NAT-PT was published before this was clear,
> and it resulted in some "misuse".
>
> We cannot prevent misuse, of course, but we can ensure that by proper
> documentation, description of the scenarios and analysis of the
> situation, this becomes clearer to the IPv6 deployers.
>
> --
> Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the
> Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds."
> Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings
>
**********************************
Madrid 2003 Global IPv6 Summit
Presentations and videos on line at:
http://www.ipv6-es.com
This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.