Re: manual config of UE tunnel [RE: 3gpp-analysis: Recommendation on tunneling in the UE]

[Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>]

On Wed, 26 Nov 2003, Jasminko Mulahusic wrote:
> > As for the client side configuration...
> > 
> > No, this does not seem to be the case.  The user just has to find out
> > the IPv4 address of the tunnel endpoint somehow.  As the tunnel
> 
> it must be completely transparent to the user. otherwise, it is a 
> non-starter. the normal user doesn't care about such things.

It can be completely transparent, yes.

> p.s. instead of endlessly repeating same arguments over and over, 
> shouldn't we write a requirements document for UE tunneling, or something?

That would be great, as it would probably help in understanding the
scenario (and it's requirements) better.  If you're volunteering....  
:-)

This seemed to have a good impact on the unmanaged tunneling 
discussion, why not here as well, then? :-)

(The document probably wouldn't even have to be published as RFC, just 
circulated as a couple of revisions of an I-D, to facilitate 
discussion..)

-- 
Pekka Savola                 "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy                    kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings