[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-v6ops-ent-scenarios-01.txt

To: "Bound, Jim" <jim.bound@hp.com>
Subject: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-v6ops-ent-scenarios-01.txt
From: Ronald van der Pol <Ronald.vanderPol@rvdp.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 23:45:05 +0100
Cc: Ronald van der Pol <Ronald.vanderPol@rvdp.org>, v6ops@ops.ietf.org
In-reply-to: <9C422444DE99BC46B3AD3C6EAFC9711B05837125@tayexc13.americas.cpqcorp.net>
References: <9C422444DE99BC46B3AD3C6EAFC9711B05837125@tayexc13.americas.cpqcorp.net>
User-agent: Mutt/1.4i

On Wed, Feb 11, 2004 at 11:38:57 -0500, Bound, Jim wrote:

> just a question?  these notes were in the previous draft I am confused.
> just checking.

Very interesting. I don't know what happened there. I got an old version,
but I am quite sure I looked at the -01 version. Anyway, the URL now
points to a version without ***Notes. I will read it tomorrow and comment
on it. Sorry for the confusion.

	rvdp

Follow-Ups:
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-v6ops-ent-scenarios-01.txt
  - From: Ronald van der Pol <Ronald.vanderPol@rvdp.org>

References:
- RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-v6ops-ent-scenarios-01.txt
  - From: "Bound, Jim" <jim.bound@hp.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Proposal for shutdown of ip6.int?
Next by Date: Re: Proposal for shutdown of ip6.int?
Previous by thread: RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-v6ops-ent-scenarios-01.txt
Next by thread: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-v6ops-ent-scenarios-01.txt
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread