[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Proposal for shutdown of ip6.int?

To: jeroen@unfix.org
Subject: Re: Proposal for shutdown of ip6.int?
From: itojun@itojun.org (Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino)
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 23:23:24 +0900 (JST)
Cc: v6ops@ops.ietf.org
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 11 Feb 2004 22:26:00 +0100" <00a001c3f0e5$a593cdd0$210d640a@unfix.org>
References: <00a001c3f0e5$a593cdd0$210d640a@unfix.org>

> Now that we have seen a RFC arise for e.f.f.3.ip6.arpa
> and there apparently will be a deployment shortly,
> wouldn't it be a good idea to start planning a closure
> of the usage of ip6.int ?
> 
> ip6.arpa was set as a standard 2 years ago by RFC3152
> which is also a BCP.

	i believe it best to wait until e.f.f.3.ip6.arpa gets actually
	installed in some way (DNAME, two "master" config, whatever).
	at this point of time there's no e.f.f.3.ip6.arpa so 6bone address
	reverse resolution sorely depend on ip6.int.

itojun

References:
- Proposal for shutdown of ip6.int?
  - From: "Jeroen Massar" <jeroen@unfix.org>

Prev by Date: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-v6ops-ent-scenarios-01.txt
Next by Date: RE: IPv6 in MPLS Networks
Previous by thread: Re: Proposal for shutdown of ip6.int?
Next by thread: I-D ACTION:draft-blanchet-v6ops-tunnelbroker-tsp-00.txt (fwd)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread