RE: WG Last Call: draft-ietf-v6ops-isp-scenarios-analysis-01.txt

[<stuart.prevost@bt.com>]

Hello Tim,

Francois pointed out an email you commented on regarding who is actually using it?

Well be may not have it deployed, but this is something BT may consider using to start IPv6 deployment in the future.  However as you should know it wont happen if the standards are not their.  Well it doesn't help, lets put it that way.

Best Regards,
Stuart

-----Original Message-----
From: Francois Le Faucheur (flefauch) [mailto:flefauch@cisco.com] 
Sent: 06 February 2004 15:19
To: FLF
Subject: FW: WG Last Call: draft-ietf-v6ops-isp-scenarios-analysis-01.txt


you guys may want to comment on that question?

>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org 
>> [mailto:owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Tim Chown
>> Sent: vendredi 6 février 2004 15:49
>> To: v6ops@ops.ietf.org
>> Subject: Re: WG Last Call: 
>> draft-ietf-v6ops-isp-scenarios-analysis-01.txt
>> 
>> 
>> Why is BGPTUNNEL recommended in this analysis?
>> 
>> Who is actually using it?
>> 
>> Also, the draft version in the analysis should be 01 not 00, 
>> if it does
>> stay in as a clearly marked last resort method...
>> 
>> Tim
>> 
>> On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 09:46:11AM -0000, Francois Le 
>> Faucheur (flefauch) wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> > 
>> > Suggestion for "8.2 Example 2"
>> > 
>> > Perhaps 
>> > 
>> > " IPv6 deployment might start with an upgrade of a couple 
>> of PE routers to support [BGPTUNNEL], because this will 
>> allow large-scale IPv6 support without hardware or software 
>> upgrades in the core. "
>> > 
>> > would read better as:
>> > 
>> > " IPv6 deployment might start with an upgrade of PE 
>> routers to support [BGPTUNNEL] (starting perhaps by a couple 
>> PE routers and then extending to other PEs as needed), 
>> because this will allow large-scale IPv6    support without 
>> hardware or software upgrades in the core. "
>> > 
>> > Otherwise, it sounds like deploying on two boxes gives 
>> "large scale support".
>> > 
>> > Cheers
>> > 
>> > Francois
>> > 
>> > >> -----Original Message-----
>> > >> From: owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org 
>> > >> [mailto:owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Pekka Savola
>> > >> Sent: vendredi 6 février 2004 06:59
>> > >> To: v6ops@ops.ietf.org
>> > >> Cc: jonne.soininen@nokia.com; mikael.lind@teliasonera.com
>> > >> Subject: WG Last Call: 
>> draft-ietf-v6ops-isp-scenarios-analysis-01.txt
>> > >> 
>> > >> 
>> > >> Hi all,
>> > >> 
>> > >> This is a WG Last Call for comments on sending
>> > >> draft-ietf-v6ops-isp-scenarios-analysis-01.txt, " Scenarios and
>> > >> Analysis for Introducing IPv6 into ISP Networks" to the IESG for
>> > >> consideration as BCP:
>> > >> 
>> > 
>> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-v6ops-isp-scen
arios-analysis-01.txt
> 
> Please review these documents carefully, and send your feedback to the
> list.  Please also indicate whether or not you believe that this document
> is ready to go to the IESG.
> 
> There has been a lack of extensive reviews from the start, so 
> reviewing this document would be especially welcome.
> 
> The last call will end in about 2.5 weeks, on 24th February.
> 
> Pekka & Jonne
> 
> 
> 
>