RE: WG Last Call: On-link Assumption and IPv6 On by default

["Bound, Jim" <jim.bound@hp.com>]

WG,

I have read both of these in depth and believe them to be result of
healthy consensus within the WG.  I support both documents going to the
IESG. 

v6onbydefault-01 needs to affect the current standard so not sure how
the chairs want to present that to the IESG. This document as standard
is my suggestion and reflection of the result in 2461biz this way the
historical glue for the change is kept in tact and my suggestion.

v6onbydefault-01 should be an informational RFC.  Not BCP because this
work will last over time no matter what we do to IPv6 and a caution for
some time to all deployments of IPv6.

Good job to the authors and thanks for the contribution.

Now lets ship the freaking thing ok and move on :--).

thanks
/jim

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org 
> [mailto:owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Pekka Savola
> Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2004 2:10 AM
> To: v6ops@ops.ietf.org
> Cc: sebastien.roy@sun.com
> Subject: WG Last Call: On-link Assumption and IPv6 On by default
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> This is a WG Last Call for comments on sending two documents to the
> IESG:
> 
> 1) draft-ietf-v6ops-onlinkassumption-01.txt, 
>    "IPv6 Neighbor Discovery On-Link Assumption Considered Harmful",
>    target category BCP.
> 
> 2) draft-ietf-v6ops-v6onbydefault-01.txt
>    "Issues with Dual Stack IPv6 on by Default",
>    target category Informational.
> 
> Please review the documents carefully, and send your feedback 
> to the list.  Please also indicate whether or not you believe 
> that these documents are ready to go to the IESG.
> 
> The last call will end in about 2 weeks, on 7th April.
> 
> Pekka & Jonne
> 
> 
> 
>