[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: comments on draft-durand-v6ops-assisted-tunneling-requirement s-00 .txt

To: "Karim El-Malki (HF/EAB)" <karim.el-malki@ericsson.com>
Subject: Re: comments on draft-durand-v6ops-assisted-tunneling-requirement s-00 .txt
From: Alain Durand <Alain.Durand@Sun.COM>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 09:57:33 -0700
Cc: "'Pekka Savola '" <pekkas@netcore.fi>, "''IPv6 Operations ' '" <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <37FB7AA6F5F9814FB634A7BF4C35A6F5639B87@ESEALNT442.al.sw.ericsson.se>
References: <37FB7AA6F5F9814FB634A7BF4C35A6F5639B87@ESEALNT442.al.sw.ericsson.se>

IP support routing. 3GPP does not support routing in the handset.
Does this makes IP not suitable for 3GPP?
No. You simply do not use this feature.
Same analogy applies here. We are not trying to design something
that works only in the 3GPP case, but can works elsewhere as well.

Btw, Marc's Blanchet point is very good: how can you be sure that
there never will be any NAT?

- Alain.

References:
- RE: comments on draft-durand-v6ops-assisted-tunneling-requirement s-00 .txt
  - From: "Karim El-Malki (HF/EAB)" <karim.el-malki@ericsson.com>

Prev by Date: RE: comments on draft-durand-v6ops-assisted-tunneling-requirement s-00 .txt
Next by Date: RE: comments on draft-durand-v6ops-assisted-tunneling-requirement s-00 .txt
Previous by thread: RE: comments on draft-durand-v6ops-assisted-tunneling-requirement s-00 .txt
Next by thread: RE: comments on draft-durand-v6ops-assisted-tunneling-requirement s-00 .txt
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread