[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Teredo vs Silkroad

To: v6ops@ops.ietf.org
Subject: Teredo vs Silkroad
From: rengrong wang <rengronw@usc.edu>
Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 14:31:43 +0800

Hi,

In draft-liumin-v6ops-silkroad-01.txt it is said that Silkroad wants to enable nodes located behind one or several IPv4 NATs to obtain IPv6 connectivity and it seems like a tunnel-broker solution. 
It is known that Teredo is a automatic tunnel mechanism that figures out the same problem.

What's the difference between Silkroad and Teredo?


Best regards,

Crisy(Rengrong) Wang
=======================================
USC,EE-Systems

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Teredo vs Silkroad
  - From: JF Tremblay <jean-francois.tremblay@hexago.com>
- Re: Teredo vs Silkroad
  - From: lidefeng <77cronux.leed0621@huawei.com>
- Re: Teredo vs Silkroad
  - From: Jeroen Massar <jeroen@unfix.org>

Prev by Date: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-v6ops-unmaneval-02.txt
Next by Date: Re: Teredo vs Silkroad
Previous by thread: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-v6ops-unmaneval-02.txt
Next by thread: Re: Teredo vs Silkroad
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread