[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Teredo vs Silkroad

To: "Liu Min" <liumin@ict.ac.cn>, "Eiffel Wu" <xgwu@ict.ac.cn>, <pekkas@netcore.fi>
Subject: RE: Teredo vs Silkroad
From: "Christian Huitema" <huitema@windows.microsoft.com>
Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 22:59:25 -0700
Cc: <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>

> Why do you think Silkroad need more relays and servers than Teredo?

The SAR's relay packets, while Teredo servers don't. It implies that you
will need more SAR servers than Teredo servers.

The number of relays is different. Depending how you count, there are
currently maybe 1 or 2 Teredo relays, or 2 millions. This is because
every host that is aware of Teredo can act as a "host specific relay". I
suspect that the number of relays required for silkroad is similar to
the number required for 6to4. 

-- Christian Huitema

Follow-Ups:
- RE: Teredo vs Silkroad
  - From: "Liu Min" <liumin@ict.ac.cn>

Prev by Date: RE: Teredo vs Silkroad
Next by Date: RE: Teredo vs Silkroad
Previous by thread: RE: Teredo vs Silkroad
Next by thread: RE: Teredo vs Silkroad
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread